3/25/2023 0 Comments Luke airtool![]() ![]() LukeAirtool is early access and has not as many pax events as PACX for now, but the developer provides regular updates. It also has an online component, which is more similar to PACX. It does not follow a particular routine, which makes it more flexible to use. LukeAirtool: it is freeware and very simple to use. I would say it is the best for airplanes with more than 19 passengers (those airplanes require a flight attendant and a copilot). You can adapt it to work with whatever airplane you like, but you cannot influence the general routine during a flight very much. It works smoothly and the amount of errors it dings you for feels right to me. PACX: maybe the best balanced pax simulator overall. Strength and weaknesses of the three products are: Most often I use LukeAirtool because you can simply play whatever announcement you deem fit at whichever time. In airplanes carrying between 6 and 19 passengers, it can feel odd that a flight attendant gives a safety briefing and serves a meal. They have a trial period, so you can just check it out and see if it works for you.Ĭan you speak to how it's less advanced than PACX? If cost was not an issue which would you choose if you could only choose one?Īll three tools are more geared towards airliners and are of limited value for smaller planes, which I currently prefer. It encourages you to fly in real time and with real weather, and your airline's reputation depends on that you fly well and follow some basic aviation rules (when to set landing lights, beacon lights etc, landing speed. Generally, it focuses more on running an airline and the economic aspects of it, but in Thunder mode you don't have to deal with that aspect a lot. It probably won't be much longer until it will be published.Ģ) OnAir is doing a pretty good job in making you fly properly as well. Just like FSCaptain, the 310 makes you pay attention to details when conducting a flight. There is actually a strong connection between both pieces of software, and you can really tell. It is not available yet, but I am one of the beta testers. So far, the closest experience to FSCaptain that I found in MSFS areġ) The new Milviz Cessna 310. Having said that, if you like some interaction with your pax, PACX is a good program. ![]() There is some overlap, in that pax aren't happy if you don't fly well, but I believe PACX only monitors a few flight parameters, not as many as FSCaptain. PACX concentrates on passengers and their comfort. FSCaptain focuses on jobs and dispatch, as well as conducting the flight as a pilot. Soon we will also be looking at supporting a charity to help children around the world.PACX and FSCaptain are quite different. Recently I received an email confirming that they have planted over a million trees. Every payment goes towards planting trees around the globe. Our server host has been really stable and helpful to the environment. Your support will go towards server cost which is £11.99pm, user interface license which costs £40py, announcements generating £80+. I also had to pay for license to keep the audio software. Generating these audios took such a long time. In fact it took me over 5 months to come up with a database of airports, destinations and airline. These premium features like Audio+, do take extremely long time to make. In return I will issue all supporters that have donated over certain amount, premium features. In return, I ask if you can donate a one off or support the project on monthly basis, it will help gradually and will make AirTool live longer. Saying that, running a software like this does cost money. I also wanted to make it free so people that simply don't have access to funds. ![]() I have seen so many payware softwares that simply do not deliver. Instead of making this payware, I have chosen to make AirTool a free software. AirTool has simply grown so big compare to what it was at the beginning. ![]() It has inspired me to keep expanding AirTool by adding features and changes that members want. I would like to thank you for your time and support using our software. My name is Luke and I am the lead developer for LukeAirTool and flyLAT. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |